The current issue of the esteemed journal Science features two studies , both of which conclude that the environmental cost of producing biofuel is higher even than that of producing conventional forms of energy. The revelation in the studies is that while previously only the relative carbon excess from burning bio and fossil fuels had been compared, the impact caused by clearing swaths of land to grow the crops has been calculated as well. The final conclusion was that the reduction in emissions from using biofuels would be outweighed 93 times by the negative impact of the land clearing required to grow biofuel crops.
On green forums around the web a sea change has occurred within the two days since the NY Times article announcing the news was released. Whereas a month ago the biofuel bandwagon was filled to capacity, it's now towing a very light load, which certainly saves on fuel, bio or otherwise.
The efforts of people like Veggie Van owner Josh Tickell is also invaluable in that it sparks interest in renewable, sustainable energy and inevitably begins new conversations revolving around curing us of our fossil fuel fixation.
The real tragedy in the release of this study would be if a single person threw up their hands with the thought that alternative energy is a pipe dream. In the end it may not be biofuel, at least not the vegetable kind, but it will certainly grow from the same spirit that brought us vegifuels.
No comments:
Post a Comment